Professor, you mentioned examining the lesion closely. What exactly will you be looking for during the examination?

This is a testimonial placeholder text

This is a testimonial placeholder text.

TEASER Summary:

Rating: 1

Evidence Supporting CIMDL:
– There is no evidence supporting CIMDL in this summary. The focus is entirely on the characteristics of lesions to determine malignancy, with no mention of progressive nasal/oral/facial damage, nasal symptoms, or palate problems indicative of CIMDL.

Missing/Conflicting Information:
– Missing information includes any reference to nasal or oral lesions as symptoms or outcomes related to CIMDL. There’s no discussion of nasal symptoms, palate problems, or secondary symptoms like infections or weight loss, which are key indicators of CIMDL.

MAIN Summary:

Rating: 2

Evidence Supporting CIMDL:
– The only indirect implication could be the oral cavity involvement, but the summary attributes this to squamous cell carcinoma, not CIMDL. There is mention of palate involvement, but this is due to cancer rather than nasal cocaine use.

Missing/Conflicting Information:
– The summary lacks any reference to cocaine use or its typical symptoms like nasal septal perforation, nasal discharge, and other features specific to CIMDL. The focus is on squamous cell carcinoma due to smoking history, not on cocaine-induced damage, which is a significant gap for diagnosing CIMDL.

When examining a lesion, I would meticulously assess several characteristics to guide the diagnostic process:

1. Symptoms Analysis:
   • Color and Texture: Variations might indicate different pathologies, such as a darkened lesion suggesting a mole or melanoma, while a pale, smooth lesion might point to a benign cyst.
   • Size and Shape: I would measure the lesion’s dimensions and observe its symmetry to differentiate between benign and malignant growths.
   • Margins: Well-defined edges could suggest a benign condition, whereas irregular, infiltrative margins might indicate malignancy.
   • Surface Changes: Ulceration or crusting may suggest malignancy or a chronic inflammatory process.
   • Consistency: Using palpation, firmness might suggest malignancy, whereas a softer mass could be cystic or benign.
2. Primary Diagnosis:
   • Based on the examination, if I observed a firm, irregular, and ulcerated lesion with poorly defined borders, I would suspect a malignancy, such as squamous cell carcinoma.
3. Differential Diagnosis:
   • Benign Nevus: A uniformly colored, smooth lesion with well-defined edges.
   • Basal Cell Carcinoma: Typically presents as a pearly nodule with telangiectasia, differing from squamous cell carcinoma.
   • Keratoacanthoma: Rapidly growing, dome-shaped lesion, often self-resolving, which can mimic squamous cell carcinoma but has a distinct course.
   • Sebaceous Cyst: A soft, mobile nodule, generally benign, lacking ulceration.

These observations, grounded in the limits of our current diagnostic era, guide our clinical reasoning.

PICHLER TEASER002/040125

Primary Diagnosis:
– Diagnosis: Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity.
– Explanation: Sigmund Freud’s history of heavy cigar smoking significantly increased his risk for oral cancer, particularly squamous cell carcinoma. The initial lesion on the hard palate, subsequent ulceration, and confirmed malignancy upon biopsy support this diagnosis. The frequent recurrence and invasive nature (affecting maxilla, mandible, and soft palate) align with the aggressive behavior typical of SCC. Additionally, the persistent issues with prosthetic obturation and trismus suggest ongoing neoplastic activity.

Differential Diagnoses:
1. Oral Leukoplakia:
– While it can present as a leukoplastic growth, it is typically a premalignant condition. The progression and biopsy-confirmed malignancy make SCC more plausible.
2. Osteoradionecrosis:
– Post-radiotherapy complications could mimic these symptoms, but the timeline and initial biopsy suggest a primary neoplastic process rather than radiation-induced necrosis.
3. Chronic Granulomatous Disease:
– Could explain ulceration and swelling, but lacks the malignant histological features observed in biopsies.
4. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma:
– While another potential salivary gland malignancy, the histopathological features and clinical progression align more closely with SCC.

Comparison:
– SCC’s aggressive nature, frequent recurrences, and treatment-resistant profile fit Freud’s clinical course better than alternatives. The primary diagnosis is supported by a consistent history of smoking, initial clinical presentations, and malignancy confirmed by repeat biopsies.

Signature:
MAIN002/040125

Termin vereinbaren

Ordination Dr. Michael Truppe
Albertgasse 3/6 1080 Wien

Telefon 01 408 95 00 66
Email ordination@smile.wien

Ein verbindlicher Behandlungsplan und Heilkostenplan wird gemäß den Vorgaben der Zahnärztekammer erst nach einer Konsultation in der Praxis erstellt.

© 2024 Eurodoc Telemedizin ForschungsgesellschaftmbH