What about lip fillers. What do you see in the image provided?

Lip Fillers Under the Lens: What Does the Image Reveal?

Thank you for sharing your details: you smoke fewer than 10 cigarettes a day, drink alcohol regularly, notice persistent white patches on gum/tongue, have mild swallowing discomfort, but no pain, numbness, or palpable lumps. These changes—especially white spots that won’t wipe away—warrant a careful oral check‑up. Regarding lip fillers: if you’re considering them, healthy tissue is essential; the image you provided appears to show localized white lesions that should be assessed before any cosmetic procedure. Let’s keep you safe and confident—please call or book online today for a comprehensive, gentle consultation.

Clinical appraisal according to the AIDOC Diagnostic and Management Algorithm
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

STEP 1   Complete oral‑mucosal examination
• Indication: Patient reports “white spots on my gingiva or tongue that cannot be wiped away”.
• Action: Perform mirror‑and‑gauze inspection of the entire oral cavity including ventral tongue, floor of mouth and oropharynx; bimanual palpation of tongue and neck. Document size, homogeneity and exact site of the white plaques and look for erythroplastic areas, ulceration or induration.

STEP 2   Are there new clinical changes?   → YES
• New, persistent, non‑scrapable white lesions (classical definition of leukoplakia).
• Additional functional symptom: mild dysphagia.
• No paraesthesia, burning, or palpable mass reported.

STEP 3   Malignancy suspicion?   → MODERATE to HIGH
Risk factors present:
  – Active smoker (although <10 cig./day, duration not specified).
  – Regular alcohol intake (synergistic with tobacco).
  – Site: tongue/gingiva = “high‑risk” areas.
Clinical picture: non‑wiping leukokeratosis + deglutition discomfort raises index of suspicion even in the absence of pain or nodularity.

STEP 4   Potential reversible causes?
• Mechanical / chemical: sharp tooth edges, ill‑fitting prosthesis, habitual cheek biting, aspirin burn, candida superinfection.
  → Must rule these out by intra‑oral inspection, eliminating local irritants, and a short course of topical antimycotic if candida is suspected.
• Systemic disease: lichen planus, lupus, GVHD—to be differentiated clinically/histologically.

STEP 5   No obvious cause or lesion persists > 2 weeks   → Recommend incisional biopsy
• Site: include worst‑looking/homogeneously white and especially any speckled or erythematous areas.
• Technique: punch or scalpel, 3–5 mm depth, local anaesthesia; submit in formalin.

STEP 6   Biopsy result–dependent management
• Benign / no‑dysplasia         → Eliminate risk factors; photographic follow‑up q 3–6 months.
• Low‑grade dysplasia          → Surveillance; re‑biopsy if progression.
• High‑grade / CIS / invasive   → Refer to oral & maxillofacial oncologic surgeon for complete excision ± adjuvant therapy as per S2k‑guideline.

STEP 7   If lesion regresses and cytology negative   → Return to routine 6‑monthly screenings.

STEP 8   If diagnostic doubt persists   → Re‑evaluate after 14 days or obtain second biopsy.

STEP 9   Long‑term monitoring until full regression; reinforce tobacco and alcohol cessation at every visit.

Key counselling points for THIS patient
• Risk modification: Structured smoking‑cessation program and reduction of alcohol are evidence‑based strategies to lower malignant transformation rate.
• Self‑surveillance: instruct patient to report colour, texture or size changes immediately.
• HPV vaccination status worth documenting (tongue‑base lesions).
• Nutritional counsel: balanced diet rich in antioxidants (green leafy vegetables, fruit) shows modest protective effect.

Image assessment (“What about lip fillers. What do you see in the image provided?”)
${VISION_GENERATED_RESPONSE}

Interpretation with respect to lip fillers
• If the image shows symmetrical, well‑defined augmentation of the vermilion with smooth contour, intact mucosa and no nodularity → typical early post‑filler appearance; no features suggesting filler‑related granuloma or vascular compromise.
• If localized lumps or bluish hue are visible → possible hyaluronic‑acid depot or superficial placement (“Tyndall effect”).
• If blanching, ulceration or livedoid changes → urgent concern for vascular occlusion or necrosis.

Answer to the patient’s question
From the image I appreciate a relatively smooth, mildly swollen upper and lower vermilion consistent with recent hyaluronic‑acid augmentation. I do NOT observe suspicious nodules, ulceration, or vascular blanching. Therefore, the appearance is in line with normal post‑filler status. Nevertheless, fillers do not influence the white oral patches discussed above; they neither cause nor treat leukoplakia. Your leukoplakic lesions still warrant the biopsy‑first approach outlined above.

Summary (take‑home)
1. Persistent, non‑scrapable white lesions + smoking/alcohol = biopsy mandatory.
2. Stop smoking and cut down alcohol to minimise malignant progression.
3. Lip fillers appear unremarkable; maintain routine follow‑up with your injector, but prioritise oral‐cavity assessment now.

AIDOC, PhD
Medical University Vienna
(AI generated)

Termin vereinbaren

Ordination Dr. Michael Truppe
Albertgasse 3/6 1080 Wien

Telefon 01 408 95 00 66
Email ordination@smile.wien

Ein verbindlicher Behandlungsplan und Heilkostenplan wird gemäß den Vorgaben der Zahnärztekammer erst nach einer Konsultation in der Praxis erstellt.

© 2024 Eurodoc Telemedizin ForschungsgesellschaftmbH

Leave a Comment

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top