kosten

Patient Inquiry about Costs

While the specific costs of minimal invasive implant surgery can vary depending on factors such as the dentist’s expertise, geographic location, and the complexity of the case, this discussion will focus on the advantages of the procedure and how AI can enhance its success.

Advantages of Minimal Invasive Implant Surgery:

1. Reduced Recovery Time: Minimal invasive techniques often result in less trauma to the surrounding tissues, which can lead to faster healing and recovery times for patients.

2. Decreased Discomfort: Patients typically experience less pain and swelling post-surgery due to the smaller incisions required for minimal invasive procedures.

3. Enhanced Precision: AI-based prediction tools improve the surgeon’s ability to plan and execute implant placement with greater accuracy, reducing the risk of complications.

4. Improved Aesthetic Outcomes: With precise implant placement, the aesthetic outcomes are often superior, as the implants can be positioned optimally within the jaw.

5. Lower Risk of Complications: Minimal invasive techniques, combined with AI predictions, can minimize the risks of surgical complications, such as infection or implant failure.

6. Optimal Use of Technology: The integration of AI in planning allows for a more personalized approach, assessing individual anatomical differences and predicting the best outcomes.

AI Augmentation of SAC Classification:

1. Enhanced Predictive Capabilities: AI can augment the SAC (Straightforward, Advanced, Complex) classification by analyzing radiographic planning data to provide more accurate predictions of insertion torque, which is critical for osteointegration success.

2. Data-Driven Insights: AI can evaluate large datasets to identify patterns and factors that contribute to successful implant integration, offering evidence-based guidance for treatment planning.

3. Real-Time Adjustments: Surgeons can use AI predictions to make real-time adjustments during surgery, optimizing implant positioning and reducing the chance of early failure.

4. Personalized Treatment Plans: By leveraging AI, treatment plans can be tailored to suit the unique anatomical and physiological characteristics of each patient, thus increasing the likelihood of successful outcomes.

Overall, the integration of AI in minimal invasive implant surgery not only enhances the precision and success rates of the procedure but also significantly benefits patients in terms of comfort, recovery, and long-term satisfaction with their dental implants.

Introduction

Implantology has significantly evolved over the years, becoming an integral part of contemporary dentistry. The Medlibre AI-SAC classification system is a comprehensive framework designed to guide clinicians in assessing the complexity of dental implant cases. This system takes into account various factors such as aesthetic concerns, bone and soft tissue conditions, surgical risks, and patient-specific medical considerations, ultimately categorizing cases as Straightforward, Advanced, or Complex.

Patient Analysis

The patient in question requires extraction and replacement of tooth number 22 with a dental implant. Analyzing the patient’s anamnesis and responses provides insights into several key factors relevant to the procedure:

1. Expectations: The patient has high expectations regarding aesthetics and functionality, indicating a need for meticulous planning and execution to achieve satisfactory outcomes.

2. Health Conditions: The patient does not have immunological diseases or diabetes mellitus, which reduces systemic risks associated with implant surgery.

3. Smoking Habit: The patient smokes 10 cigarettes per day, presenting a moderate risk factor that could influence healing and implant success.

4. Aesthetic Considerations: The gingival display at full smile is low, and the shape of the tooth crowns is rectangular. These factors contribute to the aesthetic evaluation of the case.

5. Periodontal and Soft Tissue Considerations: Gingival phenotype is low, and the soft tissue anatomy and quality are classified as „soft“ and „e,“ respectively, suggesting potential challenges in achieving optimal soft tissue aesthetics and function.

6. Bone and Surgical Considerations: The bone level at adjacent teeth and facial bone wall phenotype are classified as „zz“ and „eee,“ respectively, indicating possible deficiencies in bone volume or quality.

7. Prosthetic Considerations: Neighboring teeth are in a virgin state, which implies no pre-existing restorations that could complicate the prosthetic planning.

Classification

Considering the detailed analysis above, the case is classified as Advanced. This classification is justified by the following factors:

• Aesthetic Zone: Tooth 22 is located in the aesthetic zone, and the patient’s high expectations necessitate careful planning to avoid aesthetic compromises.

• Smoking Habit: While not a high-risk factor, the patient’s smoking habit adds a moderate level of risk to the healing process and implant success.

• Bone and Soft Tissue Conditions: Some deficiencies in bone and soft tissue quality are present, requiring minor grafting and careful management to achieve desirable results.

• Prosthetic Considerations: Standard prosthetic considerations are in play since neighboring teeth are unaltered, but the case’s placement in the aesthetic zone requires precise aesthetic planning.

Treatment Plan

The treatment plan for this Advanced classification case involves several key steps:

1. Pre-Surgical Assessment:
   • Conduct a thorough clinical examination and CBCT imaging to assess bone volume and quality.
   • Discuss smoking cessation strategies with the patient to enhance healing and implant success.
   • Evaluate the need for minor bone and soft tissue grafting to ensure adequate support for the implant.
2. Surgical Phase:
   • Perform atraumatic extraction of tooth 22, preserving as much bone as possible.
   • Place the dental implant with potential simultaneous minor bone grafting if necessary.
   • Ensure precise implant positioning to accommodate future prosthetic requirements without compromising aesthetics.
3. Prosthetic Phase:
   • After a healing period, fabricate a custom abutment and provisional restoration to assess aesthetic outcomes.
   • Finalize the prosthetic restoration with emphasis on achieving natural aesthetics and functionality.
4. Follow-Up and Maintenance:
   • Schedule regular follow-ups to monitor healing, implant integration, and prosthetic function.
   • Emphasize the importance of oral hygiene and professional cleaning to maintain implant health.

Conclusion

The decision to classify this case as Advanced hinges on the interplay of aesthetic demands, moderate surgical complexity, and the patient’s smoking habit. By addressing these factors with a comprehensive treatment plan, the likelihood of achieving successful outcomes and meeting the patient’s expectations increases significantly.

Addressing the Patient’s Question: Kosten

When considering the cost of dental implant surgery, several components must be considered, including diagnostic tests, surgical procedures, grafting materials if needed, and the final prosthetic restoration. Given the advanced nature of your case, the cost may be higher than straightforward cases due to additional procedures like bone or soft tissue grafting and custom prosthetic components. It’s crucial to consult with your dental care provider for a detailed cost breakdown and explore payment options or insurance coverage that may be available to you. Understanding these costs upfront can help you plan financially for the comprehensive care you will receive.

Sign-off:
TMJ (AI generated)

Termin vereinbaren

Ordination Dr. Michael Truppe
Albertgasse 3/6 1080 Wien

Telefon 01 408 95 00 66
Email ordination@smile.wien

Ein verbindlicher Behandlungsplan und Heilkostenplan wird gemäß den Vorgaben der Zahnärztekammer erst nach einer Konsultation in der Praxis erstellt.

© 2024 Eurodoc Telemedizin ForschungsgesellschaftmbH